tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8170718846507476773.post6288592024463633843..comments2022-12-13T14:45:12.233+00:00Comments on Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog: Further protection for pubs (1)Martin H Goodallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07079479984296674469noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8170718846507476773.post-66637681743181147872015-07-30T15:32:10.132+01:002015-07-30T15:32:10.132+01:00For some strange reason I seem previously to have ...For some strange reason I seem previously to have missed Steve Edgeller’s query of 23 May. Sorry about that.<br /><br />I agree with him that in the circumstances he mentions, the change of use could not go ahead.<br />Martin H Goodallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07079479984296674469noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8170718846507476773.post-16424964326705945302015-03-25T20:42:22.120+00:002015-03-25T20:42:22.120+00:00I understand that if a developer notifies the LPA ...I understand that if a developer notifies the LPA of his intention to change use (e.g. to A1) in accord with A.2(2), he must wait 56 days, and in the absence of Nomination etc. he may commence works and the CoU must be completed within the year.<br />What if no Nomination is received in the 56 days, but one IS received prior to the CoU taking place? <br />As drafted, it would seem that the developer could be fatally caught-out right up to the day before opening a shop, having spent substantial sums in acquisition/fit-out etc. <br />Do you concur?Steve Edgellerhttp://www.edgeplan.co.uknoreply@blogger.com