tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8170718846507476773.post8224944854308233210..comments2022-12-13T14:45:12.233+00:00Comments on Martin Goodall's Planning Law Blog: “Other indoor and outdoor sports or recreations”Martin H Goodallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07079479984296674469noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8170718846507476773.post-83324019954986542972019-02-01T17:12:17.942+00:002019-02-01T17:12:17.942+00:00I cannot give legal advice in response to casual q...I cannot give legal advice in response to casual queries, but I rather doubt whether dog-walking would involve sufficient physical exertion on the part of the dog-walker to bring it within Use Class D2. This issue is discussed in detail in my book, <i><b>The Essential Guide to the Use of Land and Buildings under the Plannning Acts</b></i> (see paragraph 16.9 inf Chapter 16).<br /><br />The dogs themselves might look at it differently, of course. When dogs are off the lead, they always seem to cover at least three or four times the mileage of their owners! But physical exertion on the part of the dogs doesn’t count for the purposes of Use Class D2.<br />Martin H Goodallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07079479984296674469noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8170718846507476773.post-25912701053455651842019-01-28T06:34:13.996+00:002019-01-28T06:34:13.996+00:00Martin I read this post with interest. In your op...Martin I read this post with interest. In your opinion would activities such as dogs walking and walking both to take exercise and for general enjoyment of being outside be physical activities within Use Class D2(e)? Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03639432711856329324noreply@blogger.com