Pages

▼
Tuesday, 28 January 2014

Breaches of planning control – the need for continuity (5)

›
The provisions of section 171B have caused quite a lot of doubt and difficulty over the years, and there are still one or two anomalies that...
10 comments:
Monday, 27 January 2014

Breaches of planning control – the need for continuity (4)

›
The first of the judgments I mentioned in this extended article ( Nicholson ) related to a breach of condition, and this is a type of breach...
Thursday, 23 January 2014

Breaches of planning control – the need for continuity (3)

›
I turn now to the change of use of a building to use as a single dwelling, to which the 4-year rule applies under section 171B(2). What thi...
6 comments:
Wednesday, 22 January 2014

Breaches of planning control – the need for continuity (2)

›
As I mentioned in the first instalment of this article, in giving judgment in Nicholson v. SSE [1998] JPL 553, the Deputy Judge made some f...
Tuesday, 21 January 2014

Breaches of planning control – the need for continuity

›
[ I generally try to avoid posting very long items in this blog, but just occasionally a topic crops up that requires a more lengthy treatme...
1 comment:
Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Bribing the NIMBYs

›
One of the things the government finds really frustrating is that they can’t MAKE local planning authorities grant planning permission. Th...
4 comments:
Tuesday, 24 December 2013

Down among the mince pies

›
Well, here we are – Merry Christmas! (as the song goes) – the end of another busy year. We are all still digesting the important changes i...
4 comments: